De epistola papae – concerning the Pope's letter
xD.
PS – a little while ago, I celebrated my fifth anniversary of blogging. This is my one thousandth post.
|
|
|
xD.
PS – a little while ago, I celebrated my fifth anniversary of blogging. This is my one thousandth post.
March 21st, 2010 at 10:53 pm
I say, do try to get your whole head into shot; you look like you’re attempting to conceal heroic jaw surgery. (Clearly not the case; it interferes with speech.)
Anyhoo, the cultus withers to cult before our eyes. Mr Ratzinger is in many ways the best thing that could happen for the cause of unbelief. His work in the CftDF has left a paper trail that demonstrates there was no “cover up” nor “conspiracy” but that the illegal concealment of the criminal abuse of minors by his colleagues was the offical policy of Holy Mother Church.
It’s such a shame that Peter Tatchell has retired from frontline activism – someone should try to perform a citizen’s arrest on Mr Ratzinger if he does come to waste millions of the British public’s money on his proposed meet & greet.
Our govt is terribly keen on criminal conspiracy & joint enterprise charges – is there any reason in law why such charges ought not to be brought against Mr Ratzinger & others in his industry? Surely religious discrimination is wrong when it works to the advantage, as well as when it works to the disadvantage, of religious adherents?
Mr Ratzinger’s corrosive casuistry has made me so very cross that to restore my good humour, only a repeat viewing of Penn & Teller’s “Bullshit! – The Vatican” will do. Am away to my sofa…
March 22nd, 2010 at 9:51 am
Hey Hildegard,
Yeah, I know. It’s a new camera that I’m still learning to use. I need to set up the tripod more permanently.
Anyway, it strikes me that his story, and in particular how it relates to the Pope, has a distance left to run.
xD.