<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Am I contradicting myself?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Willumsen</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>David Willumsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=2131#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>Test. 1 2 3 test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test. 1 2 3 test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Willumsen</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/#comment-1569</link>
		<dc:creator>David Willumsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=2131#comment-1569</guid>
		<description>I actually don&#039;t think it&#039;s a question of degree - it&#039;s binary. Either something harms someone else (directly), or it doesn&#039;t. And we should be exceedingly wary of going down the path of banning things that are (at best) indirectly harmful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a question of degree &#8211; it&#8217;s binary. Either something harms someone else (directly), or it doesn&#8217;t. And we should be exceedingly wary of going down the path of banning things that are (at best) indirectly harmful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=2131#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>Indeed. It is a question of degree, and not absolute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. It is a question of degree, and not absolute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Willumsen</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>David Willumsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=2131#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>The problem with accepting that something that does not directly harm someone else is, in fact, other-regarding, is that it always ends in a total mess...where do you draw the line? I applied to a phd-programme (self-regarding), but I harmed someone else at one step removed (by denying them a place). Every single action can be seen as other-regarding with just a little imagination. And wearing the burka does not harm someone. We may dislike it (and I do), but we do so because of the fact that it symbolises the repression of women, not because it hurts anyone (would you have a problem with un-married female partners in major law firms wearing a burka in their free time? No, because they are not oppressed [insert lawyer joke here]).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with accepting that something that does not directly harm someone else is, in fact, other-regarding, is that it always ends in a total mess&#8230;where do you draw the line? I applied to a phd-programme (self-regarding), but I harmed someone else at one step removed (by denying them a place). Every single action can be seen as other-regarding with just a little imagination. And wearing the burka does not harm someone. We may dislike it (and I do), but we do so because of the fact that it symbolises the repression of women, not because it hurts anyone (would you have a problem with un-married female partners in major law firms wearing a burka in their free time? No, because they are not oppressed [insert lawyer joke here]).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=2131#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>DW - in answer to the second point, I agree but that&#039;s not what I&#039;m interested in here.

There&#039;s a non-trivial argument that wearing the burka is a partially other-regarding issue as it sets up a social pressure to conform. Do we insist adoption agencies are even-handed because we believe equality is a priori right, good for society (or its opposite bad) or a combination of the two? Not sure.

xD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DW &#8211; in answer to the second point, I agree but that&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m interested in here.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a non-trivial argument that wearing the burka is a partially other-regarding issue as it sets up a social pressure to conform. Do we insist adoption agencies are even-handed because we believe equality is a priori right, good for society (or its opposite bad) or a combination of the two? Not sure.</p>
<p>xD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Willumsen</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2010/02/02/am-i-contradicting-myself/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>David Willumsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=2131#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this just the old chestnut about self- and other-regarding actions? Wearing a burka does not harm anyone other than (possibly) the wearer, whereas discrimination on the labour market (for non-job relevant reasons) does harm other people (i.e. the job-seekers who are, in this case, gay).

That said, nothing wrong with not doing something because the downside would outweigh the upside...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this just the old chestnut about self- and other-regarding actions? Wearing a burka does not harm anyone other than (possibly) the wearer, whereas discrimination on the labour market (for non-job relevant reasons) does harm other people (i.e. the job-seekers who are, in this case, gay).</p>
<p>That said, nothing wrong with not doing something because the downside would outweigh the upside&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

