<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progressive London Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Fair points Dave. PS I&#039;m congratulating the organisers for getting out the crowds, but we need to be more ambitious - admittedly not everyone came for the wedge issues I mentioned and I guess I exaggerate about the hangover cure from the elections - conferences are places for people to come together rather than go out and campaign.

On CRB portability, we&#039;d like ideas on what this could mean in more detail and how we could take this forward - and yeah...we&#039;re not proposing to become a komsomol.

those warm fuzzy german words, they remind me of sociology classes. i guess we&#039;re only at the gemeinsam stage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair points Dave. PS I&#8217;m congratulating the organisers for getting out the crowds, but we need to be more ambitious &#8211; admittedly not everyone came for the wedge issues I mentioned and I guess I exaggerate about the hangover cure from the elections &#8211; conferences are places for people to come together rather than go out and campaign.</p>
<p>On CRB portability, we&#8217;d like ideas on what this could mean in more detail and how we could take this forward &#8211; and yeah&#8230;we&#8217;re not proposing to become a komsomol.</p>
<p>those warm fuzzy german words, they remind me of sociology classes. i guess we&#8217;re only at the gemeinsam stage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOCIALIST UNITY &#187; PROGRESSIVE LONDON - THE BLOG REACTION</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>SOCIALIST UNITY &#187; PROGRESSIVE LONDON - THE BLOG REACTION</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>[...] The blogging session chaired by Professor Ivor Gaber has kicked off a great deal of post-conference comment. Mary Honeyball MEP was filled with “some dread” about the conference before she arrived but in the end decided it was a good day with imaginative workshops, including the blogging session. “It was a good hour and a half and very good indeed to meet other bloggers,” says Mary. “Given that I get concerned about the disembodied nature of the blogosphere, the workshop provided a welcome opportunity to meet people and discuss issues face to face.”   Dave Cole (dot org), who like Mary also contributed to the discussion during the blogging session, says the day was “pretty good” and kindly offers big thanks to the various organisers and volunteers. Dave has provided a comprehensive account of the discussions he attended and his views on what was said here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The blogging session chaired by Professor Ivor Gaber has kicked off a great deal of post-conference comment. Mary Honeyball MEP was filled with “some dread” about the conference before she arrived but in the end decided it was a good day with imaginative workshops, including the blogging session. “It was a good hour and a half and very good indeed to meet other bloggers,” says Mary. “Given that I get concerned about the disembodied nature of the blogosphere, the workshop provided a welcome opportunity to meet people and discuss issues face to face.”   Dave Cole (dot org), who like Mary also contributed to the discussion during the blogging session, says the day was “pretty good” and kindly offers big thanks to the various organisers and volunteers. Dave has provided a comprehensive account of the discussions he attended and his views on what was said here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davecole.org &#187; blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LabourSpace and tax justice</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>davecole.org &#187; blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; LabourSpace and tax justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>[...] idea that caught my eye most at the Progressive London conference was from Ken himself. Basically, it&#8217;s that every [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idea that caught my eye most at the Progressive London conference was from Ken himself. Basically, it&#8217;s that every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>Hi Noel,

If you don&#039;t mind, I&#039;ll go point by point -

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;But is it enough to bring together politicians from across the “progressive spectrum” to show our solidarity on issues like Heathrow or the living wage which portray that alternative narrative to the government?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The answer, of course, is that it is not enough. However, the conference at the weekend wasn&#039;t a love-in for lefties politicians. For one thing, the speakers weren&#039;t just politicians, but experts, journalists and trades unionists. I&#039;m not sure, either, that the ProLonCon was about expressing that solidarity, with the possible exception of the meeting on Gaza, even though those positions you mention received support from a lot of people.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Is it enough to congratulate ourselves on getting such a massive turnout at the conference?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From what I understand, turnout was something like two-and-one-half times what they were expecting. That&#039;s good, but I don&#039;t think it qualifies as &#039;massive&#039; and I haven&#039;t seen the unwarranted self-congratulation you suggest.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;People will be fairly interested in a range of issues but there’ll be one issues that really drives them - whether it’s Gaza or civil liberties&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or, in my case, transport. Political parties act as an information heuristic and not everyone&#039;s an expert, and noone&#039;s an expert on everything.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;these wedge issues were all represented…but there was no mechanism for people to take these forward from the grassroots…&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which is the problem I have with your position. I don&#039;t think people were there for particular, &#039;wedge&#039; issues as they are not all wedge issues. Indeed, I don&#039;t think people came just to attend this session or the other, but to see what was going on in general.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;It slightly astonished me when Ken talked about all the networking to get this conference off the ground, but surely this should be the start of something not just the ultimate hangover cure from the elections?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is the start of something; that&#039;s why low-cash but high-salience (no ads!) promotion, I&#039;d say, was used. Given that we spent a lot of time talking about how to deal with things after the credit crunch, I don&#039;t think you can fairly call this a &#039;hangover cure from the elections&#039;. There was, I think, only one psephological session.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;At our Compass Youth “young london” workshop, the room was packed out - with people but mainly with ideas - mentoring scheme for young people to get into green jobs, youth mayor for London with a capacity building budget, making CRB checks portable, a virtual youth club and cooperative schools.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

All great ideas. CRB portability is something I&#039;ve heard talked about before; what did you have in mind beyond &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crb.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=1870&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the current provisions&lt;/a&gt;?

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;To be even more honest, the winning idea, making CRB checks portable to enable more people (young or old!) to take part in volunteering, isn’t something that we may have thought of on our NEC, but we committed to campaign on idea that won most votes and that’s what we’ll do. In fact, we’ll support people who want to take forward the other campaigns put forward.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think that&#039;s great - really commendable. It also shows the value of people together in a forum like this. Ultimately, CY could lobby for a change in the law, help people use existing arrangements and so on, but I take it you&#039;re not proposing to become a Komsomol.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Why? Because if you give people an inch, they’ll give you a mile…oh, and because we enabled people to give us their email addresses so we can get in touch with them in doing this. It’s pretty basic, but if you ain’t got their contact details, how are you going to build a progressive coalition?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, it depends on whether you see it as a gemeinschaft or a gesselschaft... but I guess the organisers have contact details for everyone.

Disclaimer - if this post makes no sense, it&#039;s because the sleeping pill is kicking in.

xD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Noel,</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t mind, I&#8217;ll go point by point -</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;But is it enough to bring together politicians from across the “progressive spectrum” to show our solidarity on issues like Heathrow or the living wage which portray that alternative narrative to the government?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The answer, of course, is that it is not enough. However, the conference at the weekend wasn&#8217;t a love-in for lefties politicians. For one thing, the speakers weren&#8217;t just politicians, but experts, journalists and trades unionists. I&#8217;m not sure, either, that the ProLonCon was about expressing that solidarity, with the possible exception of the meeting on Gaza, even though those positions you mention received support from a lot of people.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Is it enough to congratulate ourselves on getting such a massive turnout at the conference?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>From what I understand, turnout was something like two-and-one-half times what they were expecting. That&#8217;s good, but I don&#8217;t think it qualifies as &#8216;massive&#8217; and I haven&#8217;t seen the unwarranted self-congratulation you suggest.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;People will be fairly interested in a range of issues but there’ll be one issues that really drives them &#8211; whether it’s Gaza or civil liberties&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Or, in my case, transport. Political parties act as an information heuristic and not everyone&#8217;s an expert, and noone&#8217;s an expert on everything.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;these wedge issues were all represented…but there was no mechanism for people to take these forward from the grassroots…&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Which is the problem I have with your position. I don&#8217;t think people were there for particular, &#8216;wedge&#8217; issues as they are not all wedge issues. Indeed, I don&#8217;t think people came just to attend this session or the other, but to see what was going on in general.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It slightly astonished me when Ken talked about all the networking to get this conference off the ground, but surely this should be the start of something not just the ultimate hangover cure from the elections?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It is the start of something; that&#8217;s why low-cash but high-salience (no ads!) promotion, I&#8217;d say, was used. Given that we spent a lot of time talking about how to deal with things after the credit crunch, I don&#8217;t think you can fairly call this a &#8216;hangover cure from the elections&#8217;. There was, I think, only one psephological session.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;At our Compass Youth “young london” workshop, the room was packed out &#8211; with people but mainly with ideas &#8211; mentoring scheme for young people to get into green jobs, youth mayor for London with a capacity building budget, making CRB checks portable, a virtual youth club and cooperative schools.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>All great ideas. CRB portability is something I&#8217;ve heard talked about before; what did you have in mind beyond <a href="http://www.crb.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=1870" rel="nofollow">the current provisions</a>?</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;To be even more honest, the winning idea, making CRB checks portable to enable more people (young or old!) to take part in volunteering, isn’t something that we may have thought of on our NEC, but we committed to campaign on idea that won most votes and that’s what we’ll do. In fact, we’ll support people who want to take forward the other campaigns put forward.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that&#8217;s great &#8211; really commendable. It also shows the value of people together in a forum like this. Ultimately, CY could lobby for a change in the law, help people use existing arrangements and so on, but I take it you&#8217;re not proposing to become a Komsomol.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Why? Because if you give people an inch, they’ll give you a mile…oh, and because we enabled people to give us their email addresses so we can get in touch with them in doing this. It’s pretty basic, but if you ain’t got their contact details, how are you going to build a progressive coalition?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, it depends on whether you see it as a gemeinschaft or a gesselschaft&#8230; but I guess the organisers have contact details for everyone.</p>
<p>Disclaimer &#8211; if this post makes no sense, it&#8217;s because the sleeping pill is kicking in.</p>
<p>xD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>It seemed from the conference that there are alternative narratives - moving from the “what worked” under Ken (living wage, congestion charge, etc) to the “what matters” (fairness, care &amp; solidarity) which…well really matters lot in how we frame our responses to the recession to Londoners out there who are really feeling the bite.

But is it enough to bring together politicians from across the “progressive spectrum” to show our solidarity on issues like Heathrow or the living wage which portray that alternative narrative to the government? Is it enough to congratulate ourselves on getting such a massive turnout at the conference? People will be fairly interested in a range of issues but there’ll be one issues that really drives them - whether it’s Gaza or civil liberties - these wedge issues were all represented…but there was no mechanism for people to take these forward from the grassroots…

It slightly astonished me when Ken talked about all the networking to get this conference off the ground, but surely this should be the start of something not just the ultimate hangover cure from the elections?

At our Compass Youth “young london” workshop, the room was packed out - with people but mainly with ideas - mentoring scheme for young people to get into green jobs, youth mayor for London with a capacity building budget, making CRB checks portable, a virtual youth club and cooperative schools. To be honest, with an hour an half and with four exciting speakers that we were keen to listen to as well, as well as competing against other heavweight sessions at the same time, we were scared that either no-one would turn up or not many people would want to put forward, let alone work out together what campaigns we should take forward for young Londoners.

To be even more honest, the winning idea, making CRB checks portable to enable more people (young or old!) to take part in volunteering, isn’t something that we may have thought of on our NEC, but we committed to campaign on idea that won most votes and that’s what we’ll do. In fact, we’ll support people who want to take forward the other campaigns put forward.

Why? Because if you give people an inch, they’ll give you a mile…oh, and because we enabled people to give us their email addresses so we can get in touch with them in doing this. It’s pretty basic, but if you ain’t got their contact details, how are you going to build a progressive coalition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed from the conference that there are alternative narratives &#8211; moving from the “what worked” under Ken (living wage, congestion charge, etc) to the “what matters” (fairness, care &amp; solidarity) which…well really matters lot in how we frame our responses to the recession to Londoners out there who are really feeling the bite.</p>
<p>But is it enough to bring together politicians from across the “progressive spectrum” to show our solidarity on issues like Heathrow or the living wage which portray that alternative narrative to the government? Is it enough to congratulate ourselves on getting such a massive turnout at the conference? People will be fairly interested in a range of issues but there’ll be one issues that really drives them &#8211; whether it’s Gaza or civil liberties &#8211; these wedge issues were all represented…but there was no mechanism for people to take these forward from the grassroots…</p>
<p>It slightly astonished me when Ken talked about all the networking to get this conference off the ground, but surely this should be the start of something not just the ultimate hangover cure from the elections?</p>
<p>At our Compass Youth “young london” workshop, the room was packed out &#8211; with people but mainly with ideas &#8211; mentoring scheme for young people to get into green jobs, youth mayor for London with a capacity building budget, making CRB checks portable, a virtual youth club and cooperative schools. To be honest, with an hour an half and with four exciting speakers that we were keen to listen to as well, as well as competing against other heavweight sessions at the same time, we were scared that either no-one would turn up or not many people would want to put forward, let alone work out together what campaigns we should take forward for young Londoners.</p>
<p>To be even more honest, the winning idea, making CRB checks portable to enable more people (young or old!) to take part in volunteering, isn’t something that we may have thought of on our NEC, but we committed to campaign on idea that won most votes and that’s what we’ll do. In fact, we’ll support people who want to take forward the other campaigns put forward.</p>
<p>Why? Because if you give people an inch, they’ll give you a mile…oh, and because we enabled people to give us their email addresses so we can get in touch with them in doing this. It’s pretty basic, but if you ain’t got their contact details, how are you going to build a progressive coalition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Animal. I think it was useful and I hope it continues; particularly, the cross-party spirit gave me encouragement.

xD.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dave Cole’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://davecole.org/blog/2009/01/26/the-year-of-the-ox/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The year of the ox&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Animal. I think it was useful and I hope it continues; particularly, the cross-party spirit gave me encouragement.</p>
<p>xD.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Dave Cole’s last blog post..<a href="http://davecole.org/blog/2009/01/26/the-year-of-the-ox/" rel="nofollow">The year of the ox</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A lighter shade of green? &#171; Confessions of a Political Animal</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>A lighter shade of green? &#171; Confessions of a Political Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>[...] Jones, speaking at last weekend&#8217;s Progressive London conference (good write up from Dave Cole here), as saying I&#8217;m going to give you the gist of something I wrote for the current mayor, Boris [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jones, speaking at last weekend&#8217;s Progressive London conference (good write up from Dave Cole here), as saying I&#8217;m going to give you the gist of something I wrote for the current mayor, Boris [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Animal</title>
		<link>http://www.davecole.org/blog/2009/01/25/progressive-london-conference/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davecole.org/blog/?p=1051#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>Dave,
Thanks for the write-up - very useful as I wasn&#039;t able to get along on the day. Sounds like some useful discussions were had: it will be interesting to see how this pans out.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Political Animal’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://politicalanimals.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/a-lighter-shade-of-green/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A lighter shade of green?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
Thanks for the write-up &#8211; very useful as I wasn&#8217;t able to get along on the day. Sounds like some useful discussions were had: it will be interesting to see how this pans out.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Political Animal’s last blog post..<a href="http://politicalanimals.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/a-lighter-shade-of-green/" rel="nofollow">A lighter shade of green?</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

